Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Counseling Psychologist
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dowd, E. T.
Right arrow Articles by Milne, C. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Paradoxical Interventions in Counseling Psychology

E. Thomas Dowd

University of Nebraska

Christopher R. Milne

University of Nebraska

This article discusses the use of paradoxical interventions in counseling psychology and surveys the research literature to date. After a description of the historical background of paradoxical interventions, current schools of therapy using paradox are presented, including the psychotherapy of Milton Erickson, the Palo Alto group founded by Gregory Bateson, the Milan School, and the Ackerman Brief Therapy Project. The theoretical and definitional underpinnings of paradoxical interventions are then discussed,"with particular attention paid to the concept of the double bind. A categorization and description of the different paradoxical strategies is described in detail, with guidelines and caveats for the therapeutic management of paradox in counseling. The article concludes with a summary of the research on paradoxical interventions including both case studies and experimental investigations and with recommendations for future research.

The Counseling Psychologist, Vol. 14, No. 2, 237-282 (1986)
DOI: 10.1177/0011000086142002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
A. E. Kelly and M. M. Nauta
Reactance and Thought Suppression
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, November 1, 1997; 23(11): 1123 - 1132.
[Abstract]


Home page
The Family JournalHome page
T. L. Sexton and D. Montgomery
Ethical and Therapeutic Acceptability: A Study of Paradoxical Techniques
The Family Journal, July 1, 1994; 2(3): 215 - 228.
[Abstract]


Home page
The Counseling PsychologistHome page
C. E. Hill
Research on Therapist Techniques in Brief Individual Therapy: Implications for Practitioners
The Counseling Psychologist, October 1, 1992; 20(4): 689 - 711.
[Abstract]


Home page
The Counseling PsychologistHome page
B. N. Steenbarger
Toward Science-Practice Integration in Brief Counseling and Therapy
The Counseling Psychologist, July 1, 1992; 20(3): 403 - 450.
[Abstract]


Home page
The Counseling PsychologistHome page
C. D. Claiborn and J. W. Lichtenberg
Interactional Counseling
The Counseling Psychologist, July 1, 1989; 17(3): 355 - 453.
[Abstract]


Home page
The Counseling PsychologistHome page
E. T. Dowd
Paradoxical Interventions: Contextualization and Decontextualization
The Counseling Psychologist, January 1, 1987; 15(1): 159 - 163.