Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Counseling Psychologist
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holahan, W.
Right arrow Articles by Yesenosky, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Conference

Subgroups within Division 17

Divisiveness or Opportunity for Cohesion?

William Holahan

State College, Pennsylvania

Janice M. Yesenosky

Kent State University

A national survey of 800 members of Division 17 (Counseling Psychology) was conducted to assess attitudes about selected work sites and professional activities for counseling psychologists. Survey items were written to represent worksites and activities that have been traditionally associated with either counseling or clinical psychology. Responses to the survey were analyzed through an oblique rotation principle components analysis of survey items, the assignment of standardized scores to respondents' data, and the subsequent cluster analysis of standardized scores. Based on responses to the attitude survey items three subgroups of respondents emerged, which were named Clinical Counseling Psychologists, Central Counseling Psychologists, and Traditional Counseling Psychologists. These subgroups are described and the implications of their existence within Division 17 are discussed.

The Counseling Psychologist, Vol. 20, No. 4, 660-676 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/0011000092204010


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The Counseling PsychologistHome page
N. A. Fouad, R. H. McPherson, L. Gerstein, D. L. Blustein, N. Elman, K. I. Helledy, and A. J. Metz
Houston, 2001: Context and Legacy
The Counseling Psychologist, January 1, 2004; 32(1): 15 - 77.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The Counseling PsychologistHome page
D. B. PopeDavis, G. L. Stone, and D. Nielson
Factors Influencing the Stated Career Goals of Minority Graduate Students in Counseling Psychology Programs
The Counseling Psychologist, October 1, 1997; 25(4): 683 - 698.
[Abstract]


Home page
The Counseling PsychologistHome page
S. M. Quintana and M. E. Bernal
Ethnic Minority Training in Counseling Psychology: Comparisons with Clinical Psychology and Proposed Standards
The Counseling Psychologist, January 1, 1995; 23(1): 102 - 121.
[Abstract]


Home page
The Counseling PsychologistHome page
C. E. Watkins Jr.
On Hope, Promise, and Possibility in Counseling Psychology or Some Simple, but Meaningful Observations about Our Specialty
The Counseling Psychologist, April 1, 1994; 22(2): 315 - 334.
[Abstract]