Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Counseling Psychologist
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bernstein, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Kerr, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Conference

Counseling Psychology and the Scientist-Practitioner Model

Implementation and Implications

Bianca L. Bernstein

Arizona State University

Barbara Kerr

Arizona State University

The ways in which the scientist-practitioner model has been implemented in the admissions and training processes of psychology programs are examined. Institutional pressures on counseling psychology faculty have led to admissions procedures that are highly biased in favor of science. Not only have most training programs failed to provide the clinical training desired and needed by practitioners, but even the most scientifically oriented programs have often failed to provide the conditions necessary to the development of talented researchers. Recommendations are given for admissions and training procedures that can bring about a stronger integration of science and practice.

The Counseling Psychologist, Vol. 21, No. 1, 136-151 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/0011000093211008
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 The Counseling PsychologistHome page
N. L. Murdock
On Science-Practice Integration in Everyday Life: A Plea for Theory
The Counseling Psychologist, July 1, 2006; 34(4): 548 - 569.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 The Counseling PsychologistHome page
K. Chwalisz
Evidence-Based Practice:: A Framework for Twenty-First-Century Scientist-Practitioner Training
The Counseling Psychologist, September 1, 2003; 31(5): 497 - 528.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 The Counseling PsychologistHome page
D. R. Forsyth and M. R. Leary
Achieving the Goals of the Scientist-Practitioner Model:: The Seven Interfaces of Social and Counseling Psychology
The Counseling Psychologist, April 1, 1997; 25(2): 180 - 200.
[Abstract]

Home page
 The Counseling PsychologistHome page
P. G. Kaczmarek and M. T. Riva
Facilitating Adolescent Optimal Development: Training Considerations for Counseling Psychologists
The Counseling Psychologist, July 1, 1996; 24(3): 400 - 432.
[Abstract]

Home page
 The Counseling PsychologistHome page
C. Hanish, J. J. Horan, B. Keen, C. C. St. Peter, S. D. Ceperich, and J. F. Beasley
The Scientific Stature of Counseling Psychology Training Programs: A Still Picture of a Shifting Scene
The Counseling Psychologist, January 1, 1995; 23(1): 82 - 101.
[Abstract]