This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Sexton, T. L. Articles by Whiston, S. C. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Status of the Counseling Relationship

An Empirical Review, Theoretical Implications, and Research Directions

University of Nevada, Las Vegas

Susan C. Whiston

University of Nevada, Las Vegas

The quality of the counseling relationship has consistently been found to have the most significant impact on successful client outcome. Yet the definition and critical components of a quality counseling relationship remain in question. This article is a systematic review of studies of the counseling relationship intended to identify the present empirical understanding of this essential element of counseling. Using the multidimensional model proposed by Gelso & Carter, empirical support for the "real, " "unreal, " and "working alliance" elements of the relationship are summarized. Studies investigating the interactional nature of the counseling relationship are also reported. In addition, implications of a potential "paradigm" shift in thinking of the counseling relationship are discussed in regard to the development of theoretical models and future research agendas. In particular, the authors outline how the adoption of a social constructivist perspective would change the focus of the theoretical models and systematic research.

The Counseling Psychologist, Vol. 22, No. 1, 6-78 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/0011000094221002


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Jen der Pan, L.-Y. F. Deng, and S.-L. Tsai Evaluating the Use of Reflective Counseling Group Supervision for Military Counselors in Taiwan Research on Social Work Practice, July 1, 2008; 18(4): 346 - 355. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Myers Relational Healing: To Be Understood And To Understand Journal of Humanistic Psychology, January 1, 2003; 43(1): 86 - 104. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. L. Sexton and J. F. Alexander Family-Based Empirically Supported Interventions The Counseling Psychologist, March 1, 2002; 30(2): 238 - 261. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Y. Flores and M. J. Heppner Multicultural Career Counseling: Ten Essentials for Training Journal of Career Development, January 1, 2002; 28(3): 181 - 202. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. M. Quintana and S. E. Maxwell Implications of Recent Developments in Structural Equation Modeling for Counseling Psychology The Counseling Psychologist, July 1, 1999; 27(4): 485 - 527. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. A. Carter Refining Notions through Converging Paradigms The Counseling Psychologist, January 1, 1994; 22(1): 79 - 81.

				G. G. Kolden, K. I. Howard, and M. S. Maling The Counseling Relationship and Treatment Process and Outcome The Counseling Psychologist, January 1, 1994; 22(1): 82 - 89.

				C. E. Hill What is the Therapeutic Relationship?: A Reaction to Sexton and Whiston The Counseling Psychologist, January 1, 1994; 22(1): 90 - 97.

				L. E. Beutler and M. Sandowicz The Counseling Relationship: What is it? The Counseling Psychologist, January 1, 1994; 22(1): 98 - 103.