Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Counseling Psychologist
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hanish, C.
Right arrow Articles by Beasley, J. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Conference

The Scientific Stature of Counseling Psychology Training Programs

A Still Picture of a Shifting Scene

Christine Hanish

Arizona State University

John J. Horan

Arizona State University

Beth Keen

Arizona State University

Carolyn Cox St. Peter

Arizona State University

Sherry Dyche Ceperich

Arizona State University

Julie F. Beasley

Arizona State University

Previous research examining the scientific stature of counseling psychology training programs has not attended to emerging methodological issues. Two databases (PsycLIT from 1974 to June of 1991 and the Social Science Citation Index [SSCI] from 1971 to 1991) provided publication and citation frequencies for all 488 counseling psychology faculty affiliated with all 68 currently active doctoral programs. Grand total scores from these databases were determined and then adjusted on the basis of faculty size alone, faculty age alone, and faculty size and age combined. An additional stability correction was derived by deleting the record of the most prolific (PsycLIT) or cited (SSCI) faculty member from the total scores of each program. The leading programs identified on the basis of the 11 adjusted and unadjusted measures of scientific stature are presented. An r of .70 between PsycLIT and SSCI was found.

The Counseling Psychologist, Vol. 23, No. 1, 82-101 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/0011000095231009
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 The Counseling PsychologistHome page
N. M. Diegelman, R. A. Uffelman, K. S. Wagner, and S. A. Diegelman
Current Institutional Trends in Research Productivity in Counseling Psychology Journals
The Counseling Psychologist, May 1, 2005; 33(3): 327 - 339.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 The Counseling PsychologistHome page
P. A. Gore Jr., N. L. Murdock, and S. J. Haley
Entering the Ivory Tower: Characteristics of Successful Counseling Psychology Faculty Applicants
The Counseling Psychologist, July 1, 1998; 26(4): 640 - 657.
[Abstract]

Home page
 The Counseling PsychologistHome page
J. J. Horan, C. Hanish, and J. F. Beasley
A Methodological Reply to a Motivational Charge
The Counseling Psychologist, January 1, 1995; 23(1): 125 - 128.