This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Enns, C. Z. Articles by Gilbert, M. S. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

The Debate about Delayed Memories of Child Sexual Abuse

A Feminist Perspective

Cornell College

Cheryl L. McNeilly

University of Iowa

Julie Madison Corkery

University of Iowa

Mary S. Gilbert

University of Iowa

The debate about delayed memories of child sexual abuse has generated strong emotions and has polarized many psychologists and members of the public. At times, individuals have adopted absolute positions without adequate knowledge of the complex issues involved. This article provides information about the current debate regarding the veracity of delayed memories of child sexual abuse, describes the historical context in which this controversy occurs, discusses the growth and development of psychotherapy for trauma survivors, and reviews the theoretical and empirical literature relevant to abuse memories. The article also outlines recommendations about foundations of knowledge and interventions that will help psychologists engage in competent and ethical practices with clients and generates an initial set of recommendations for future research, training, and social change.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. S. Farmer Focus on Division 17's Committee on Women/Section for the Advancement of Women (SAW) 1970-2030: Achievements and Challenges The Counseling Psychologist, May 1, 2002; 30(3): 417 - 440. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Miltenburg and E. Singer The (Ab)use of Reliving Childhood Traumata Theory Psychology, October 1, 1997; 7(5): 605 - 628. [Abstract]

				J. J. Freyd II. Violations of Power, Adaptive Blindness and Betrayal Trauma Theory Feminism Psychology, February 1, 1997; 7(1): 22 - 32.

				J. Schuman and M. Galvez A Meta/Multi-Discursive Reading of `False Memory Syndrome' Feminism Psychology, February 1, 1996; 6(1): 7 - 29. [Abstract]

				L. J. Rubin Childhood Sexual Abuse: Whose Memories are Faulty? The Counseling Psychologist, January 1, 1996; 24(1): 140 - 143.

				C. J. Brack, G. Brack, and K. Infante Couples Counseling with Survivors of Child and Adolescent Abuse The Family Journal, October 1, 1995; 3(4): 306 - 315. [Abstract]

				D. S. Lindsay Beyond Backlash: Comments on Enns, McNeilly, Corkery, and Gilbert The Counseling Psychologist, April 1, 1995; 23(2): 280 - 289.

				J. Briere Science Versus Politics in the Delayed Memory Debate: A Commentary The Counseling Psychologist, April 1, 1995; 23(2): 290 - 293.

				C. A. Courtois Scientist-Practitioners and the Delayed Memory Controversy: Scientific Standards and the Need for Collaboration The Counseling Psychologist, April 1, 1995; 23(2): 294 - 299.

				E. F. Loftus, E. M. Milo, and J. R. Paddock The Accidental Executioner: Why Psychotherapy Must be Informed by Science The Counseling Psychologist, April 1, 1995; 23(2): 300 - 309.

				L. S. Brown Toward Not Forgetting: The Science and Politics of Memory The Counseling Psychologist, April 1, 1995; 23(2): 310 - 314.