Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Counseling Psychologist
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bieschke, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Croteau, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Using Social Cognitive Career Theory to Create Affirmative Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Research Training Environments

Kathleen J. Bieschke

Pennsylvania State University

Amy B. Eberz

Pennsylvania State University

Christine C. Bard

Pennsylvania State University

James M. Croteau

Western Michigan University

Historically, counseling psychologists have conducted relatively few empirical studies addressing lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) issues. Methodological challenges, heterosexism, and homophobia present particular challenges to facilitating such research. Moreover, research suggests that graduate students receive little or no training about conducting LGB research The authors examine social cognitive career theory (Lent, Brown, & Hackeu, 1994) to generate recommendations for creating research training environments that are affirming of LGB issues. Based on this model, suggestions are offered to influence several aspects of the research training environment: distal and proximal environmental influences, individual variables, students' research self-efficacy beliefs, and students' research outcome expectations. It is hoped that these recommendations will help to improve graduate training programs and to advance empirical knowledge about LGB issues in psychology.

The Counseling Psychologist, Vol. 26, No. 5, 735-753 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/0011000098265003
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 The Counseling PsychologistHome page
J. C. Phillips, K. M. Ingram, N. G. Smith, and E. J. Mindes
Methodological and Content Review of Lesbian-, Gay-, and Bisexual-Related Articles in Counseling Journals: 1990-1999
The Counseling Psychologist, January 1, 2003; 31(1): 25 - 62.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 The Counseling PsychologistHome page
R. L. Worthington and R. L. Navarro
Pathways to the Future: Analyzing the Contents of a Content Analysis
The Counseling Psychologist, January 1, 2003; 31(1): 85 - 92.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 The Counseling PsychologistHome page
J. M. Abreu
Theory and Research on Stereotypes and Perceptual Bias: A Didactic Resource for Multicultural Counseling Trainers
The Counseling Psychologist, July 1, 2001; 29(4): 487 - 512.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Career AssessmentHome page
P. A. Gore Jr. and W. C. Leuwerke
Predicting Occupational Considerations: A Comparison of Self-Efficacy Beliefs, Outcome Expectations, and Person-Environment Congruence
Journal of Career Assessment, July 1, 2000; 8(3): 237 - 250.
[Abstract] [PDF]