Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Counseling Psychologist
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wampold, B. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Bashing Positivism and Reversing a Medical Model Under the Guise of Evidence

Bruce E. Wampold

University of Wisconsin-Madison, wampold{at}education.wisc.edu

In her advocacy of a model to train counseling psychologists as "evidence-based practitioners," Chwalisz (2003 [this issue]) criticizes research based on positivism and advocates for methodological pluralism but ironically suggests the adoption of a medical model to influence the discourse on practice. In this comment, the author examines (a) issues raised by methodological pluralism and multiple sources of evidence and (b) dilemmas created by criticizing quantitative methods while at the same time adopting a medical model. Finally, the author suggests that methodological inclusiveness does not logically imply, and should not lead to, rejection of quantitative methods in counseling psychology.

The Counseling Psychologist, Vol. 31, No. 5, 539-545 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0011000003256356


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Management InquiryHome page
J. R. Bailey, C. M. Ford, and J. D. Raelin
Philosophical Ties That Bind Practice: The Case of Creativity
Journal of Management Inquiry, March 1, 2009; 18(1): 27 - 38.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The Family JournalHome page
K. W. Nelson and S. Southern
Expanding the View of Scholarship
The Family Journal, July 1, 2008; 16(3): 197 - 198.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Behavioral ScientistHome page
D. Myers
Implication of the Scientist-Practitioner Model in Counseling Psychology Training and Practice
American Behavioral Scientist, February 1, 2007; 50(6): 789 - 796.
[Abstract] [PDF]