Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Counseling Psychologist
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liu, W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ali, S. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Addressing Social Class and Classism in Vocational Theory and Practice

Extending the Emancipatory Communitarian Approach

William Ming Liu

University of Iowa, William-liu{at}uiowa.edu

Saba Rasheed Ali

University of Iowa

The emancipatory communitarian approach to vocational development is congruent with previous calls to counseling psychologists to be oriented to social justice in their research and practice. However, even in the current emancipatory communitarian approach, an implicit upward mobility bias favors some vocations. To help understand how to better apply the emancipatory communitarian approach, a social class and classism framework is incorporated to explore how upward mobility bias distorts and ignores negative aspects of higher status and higher prestige jobs and does not recognize potential positive aspects of lower status and working-class jobs.

The Counseling Psychologist, Vol. 33, No. 2, 189-196 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0011000004272269


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Career DevelopmentHome page
S. L. R. Bennett
Contextual Affordances of Rural Appalachian Individuals
Journal of Career Development, March 1, 2008; 34(3): 241 - 262.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The Counseling PsychologistHome page
J. L. Werth Jr., N. J. Borges, C. J. McNally, C. P. Maguire, and P. J. Britton
The Intersections of Work, Health, Diversity, and Social Justice: Helping People Living With HIV Disease
The Counseling Psychologist, January 1, 2008; 36(1): 16 - 41.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The Counseling PsychologistHome page
E. H. McWhirter, D. L. Blustein, and J. C. Perry
Annunciation: Implementing an Emancipatory Communitarian Approach to Vocational Psychology
The Counseling Psychologist, March 1, 2005; 33(2): 215 - 224.
[Abstract] [PDF]