Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Counseling Psychologist
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Betz, N. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Enhancing Research Productivity in Counseling Psychology

Reactions to Three Perspectives

Nancy E. Betz

Ohio State University

The present reaction responds to the three research-related core articles in the Scientific Forum of the May 2005 issue of The Counseling Psychologist. I agree that too few of our studies are based on theories or models. Using the nomological network, I suggest how research ideas can more readily be depicted to allow model and theory testing. I comment on some aspects of structural equation modeling and note the usefulness of analyzing how we can improve our use of this increasingly popular method. Finally, I note the striking findings of institutional mobility, both upward and downward, in research productivity and suggest that in-depth analysis of a few of the most dramatic moves might help to explain these findings.

The Counseling Psychologist, Vol. 33, No. 3, 358-366 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0011000004274128
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 The Counseling PsychologistHome page
S. Aegisdottir, L. H. Gerstein, and D. C. Cinarbas
Methodological Issues in Cross-Cultural Counseling Research: Equivalence, Bias, and Translations
The Counseling Psychologist, March 1, 2008; 36(2): 188 - 219.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 The Counseling PsychologistHome page
J. P. Griffin JR and E. Miller
A Research Practitioner's Perspective on Culturally Relevant Prevention: Scientific and Practical Considerations for Community-Based Programs
The Counseling Psychologist, November 1, 2007; 35(6): 850 - 859.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 The Counseling PsychologistHome page
M. P. Martens
Future Directions of Structural Equation Modeling in Counseling Psychology
The Counseling Psychologist, May 1, 2005; 33(3): 375 - 382.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 The Counseling PsychologistHome page
C. A. Karr and L. M. Larson
Keeping Theory Revision Front and Center in Counseling Psychology: Moving From Discussion to Action
The Counseling Psychologist, May 1, 2005; 33(3): 383 - 388.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 The Counseling PsychologistHome page
R. A. Uffelman, K. S. Wagner, N. M. Diegelman, and S. A. Diegelman
Who Defines What Is Valued in Counseling Psychology? Reply to the Four Reactions
The Counseling Psychologist, May 1, 2005; 33(3): 389 - 394.
[Abstract] [PDF]