This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Martens, M. P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Future Directions of Structural Equation Modeling in Counseling Psychology

University at Albany, State University of New York

The four reactions in the May 2005 issue of The Counseling Psychologist address several considerations regarding the use of structural equation modeling (SEM) in counseling psychology research, including its appropriateness for analyzing one’s data and testing one versus multiple theoretical models. In addition, points that are not mentioned in the author’s original article were also covered, such as evaluating the fit of one’s model, item parceling, and the generalizability of findings. These four reactions are discussed in the context of raising awareness among counseling psychology researchers of considerations associated with the use of SEM.

The Counseling Psychologist, Vol. 33, No. 3, 375-382 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0011000005274598


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?