The Counseling Psychologist

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Neimeyer, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Rice, K. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Counseling Psychologist, Vol. 33, No. 5, 635-654 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0011000005277821

Does the Model Matter? The Relationship Between Science-Practice Emphasis and Outcomes in Academic Training Programs in Counseling Psychology

Greg J. Neimeyer

University of Florida

Jocelyn Saferstein

University of Florida

Kenneth G. Rice

University of Florida

The emphasis on the commitment to science and practice varies among counseling psychology training programs, and this article reports two studies that examine whether these different emphases are linked to distinctive outcomes. Study 1 examined outcomes related to students and faculty within science-oriented, balanced science-practice, and practice-oriented counseling psychology programs. Study 2 examined the differential success and placement of doctoral students in matching to predoctoral internships. Against a backdrop of substantial similarity, differential commitments to science and practice within programs were related to selected differences in faculty and student outcomes in conceptually coherent ways. Scholarly productivity and internship placements, for example, varied according the science-practice emphasis of the training program, providing qualified support for future work that might further address the relationship between training models and outcomes in counseling psychology.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 The Counseling PsychologistHome page
P. H. Munley, W. E. Pate II, and L. E. Duncan
Demographic, Educational, Employment, and Professional Characteristics of Counseling Psychologists
The Counseling Psychologist, March 1, 2008; 36(2): 250 - 280.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 The Counseling PsychologistHome page
G. J. Neimeyer and R. K. Goodyear
Empirical Reflections on Academic Training Programs in Counseling Psychology: Contexts and Commitments
The Counseling Psychologist, September 1, 2005; 33(5): 605 - 609.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 The Counseling PsychologistHome page
R. P. Bingham
Setting the Counseling Psychology Agenda: Principled Commitments Balanced With Market Realities
The Counseling Psychologist, September 1, 2005; 33(5): 676 - 682.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 The Counseling PsychologistHome page
C. D. Stoltenberg
Reflections on Reflections: Training in Counseling Psychology
The Counseling Psychologist, September 1, 2005; 33(5): 683 - 691.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 The Counseling PsychologistHome page
J. A. E. Cornish and M. T. Riva
A Broad View of Education and Training
The Counseling Psychologist, September 1, 2005; 33(5): 692 - 700.
[Abstract] [PDF]