Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on The Virtual Advisor

The Counseling Psychologist
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Worrell, F. C.
Right arrow Articles by Fhagen-Smith, P. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Generalizing Nigrescence Profiles

Cluster Analyses of Cross Racial Identity Scale (CRIS) Scores in Three Independent Samples

Frank C. Worrell

University of California, Berkeley

Beverly J. Vandiver

Barbara A. Schaefer

Pennsylvania State University

William E. Cross, Jr.

CUNY Graduate Center

Peony E. Fhagen-Smith

Wheaton College

The two studies in this article examine the interpretability and generalizability of nigrescence profiles based on Cross Racial Identity Scale scores across different educational contexts. Study 1 participants (N = 333) came from a predominantly White institution (PWI) and were grouped into six clusters labeled Afrocentric, multiculturalist, assimilated, immersion, low race salience, and miseducated variant. The two samples in Study 2 consisted of students from PWIs (N = 314) and from historically Black colleges and universities (HBCUs;N = 306), respectively. Both PWI and HBCU participants were grouped into five clusters. Four of the six original clusters (assimilated, immersion, low race salience, and miseducated variant) replicated in both samples, and one (multiculturalists) replicated only in the PWI sample. The results indicate that there are generalizable racial identity profiles in the Black population. The authors discuss the implications of the findings.

The Counseling Psychologist, Vol. 34, No. 4, 519-547 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0011000005278281


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
F. C. Worrell and S. Watson
A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of Cross Racial Identity Scale (CRIS) Scores: Testing the Expanded Nigrescence Model
Educational and Psychological Measurement, December 1, 2008; 68(6): 1041 - 1058.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
AssessmentHome page
C. Simmons, F. C. Worrell, and J. M. Berry
Psychometric Properties of Scores on Three Black Racial Identity Scales
Assessment, September 1, 2008; 15(3): 259 - 276.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Black PsychologyHome page
F. C. Worrell
Nigrescence Attitudes in Adolescence, Emerging Adulthood, and Adulthood
Journal of Black Psychology, May 1, 2008; 34(2): 156 - 178.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gifted Child QuarterlyHome page
F. C. Worrell
Ethnic Identity, Academic Achievement, and Global Self-Concept in Four Groups of Academically Talented Adolescents
Gifted Child Quarterly, January 1, 2007; 51(1): 23 - 38.
[Abstract] [PDF]